I recently received an email from a reader in his 50s who plans to retire in four years. He told me he’s just getting started in investing and wanted some ideas for “rapid growth.”

Yikes!

Hopefully, he’s got a large 401(k), a pension, or an inheritance. Four years isn’t enough time to get your finances ready for retirement if you’re starting from scratch.

While I like a good speculation as much as anyone, the reader’s approach flies in the face of how to actually make serious money in the markets…

The Dividends Statistics Speak for Themselves

If you’re investing in stocks for the long term, the best thing you can do* is buy stable companies with a track record of increasing their dividends and then reinvest those dividends.

Sure, they may only be 3% or 4% dividends, but you’ll be shocked at the way they can create significant wealth. I’ll show you exactly what I mean in just a moment, but first, check out these eye-popping statistics from Bloomberg LP on reinvested dividends:

Let’s dig deeper…

What Dividend-Paying Companies Are Telling You

The first question to ask yourself when investing in dividends is whether you want stocks that are Dividend Aristocrats or Dividend Achievers.

By raising the dividend, company executives are telling you two things…

And of course, if you receive more dividends every year, your yield on cost (i.e. the yield on the price you originally paid) rises. For example, if you buy a $50 stock with a $2 annual dividend, your yield is 4%. But five years later, if the dividend has risen to $3, your yield on cost is 6%, even if the share price has doubled to $100.

So what’s the best way to go about investing in dividend-paying stocks?

Are You Looking At These Two Crucial Numbers? You Should Be…

After you’ve identified a Dividend Aristocrat or Achiever, you want to be sure the company can continue to pay its dividend.

You can do that by examining its payout ratio – the percentage of net income that’s paid out in dividends. (And when it comes to determining income, I prefer to use levered free cash flow, as it’s much harder for a company to manipulate the numbers.) Generally speaking, you want the payout ratio to be 75% or less. That gives the company plenty of room to still pay the dividend if net income or cash flow decrease in any given year.

So once you’re pocketing healthy dividends, why should you then reinvest them?

Simple…

A 12.4% Return While Underperforming the S&P 500

Here’s a great example of the power of compounding reinvested dividends. It comes from one of my favorite stocks – Genuine Parts Co. (NYSE: GPC).

Genuine Parts has increased its dividend every year for the past 56 years! That’s an extraordinary record. To put that in perspective, the last time it didn’t raise its dividend, President Eisenhower was in office, Elvis made his television debut on the Louisiana Hayride and The Lawrence Welk Show premiered.

Needless to say, Genuine Parts is a strong performer. Over the past 10 years alone, its share price has doubled.

But for the sake of our example, let’s assume a 9% annual increase in share price – less than the 9.6% average return of the S&P 500 over the past 50 years.

Let’s say you bought 200 shares today (with GPC’s share price around $57, that would cost you around $11,400), reinvested the dividend and the dividend increased by 6.8% per year (the average of the past 27 years)… what would happen? After 10 years, your original $11,400 investment would be worth $36,659.98, growing by an average of 12.4% per year – even while the stock underperformed the S&P 500 by over half a percentage point.

I used the underperformance figure simply to illustrate a point. I actually expect Genuine Parts to outperform the S&P 500 over the next decade.*

Now imagine if you have a portfolio of dividend-paying Aristocrat stocks doing the same thing. If you had a portfolio worth $100,000 and it had the same parameters of the Genuine Parts example above, but your portfolio simply matched the performance of the S&P, your $100,000 would nearly triple in 10 years.

And the power of compounding really gets going in the following decade, as your investment would soar to $891,000. That compares with $208,000 after 10 years and $520,000 after 20 years if you didn’t reinvest the dividend.

Unfortunately, for the reader I mentioned at the top, this is a long-term strategy and wouldn’t get him to his goals in four years. But if you have a longer timeframe, reinvesting in quality dividend-paying stocks is an excellent strategy for creating and preserving wealth.*

Good Investing,

Marc Lichtenfeld

 

*The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of professional analysts.

8 Responses

  1. Marc
    I am reading your recent book, and after years of investing and a Chairman Club member of Oxford Club, I have never had such good advice. I’m making it required reading for my children and grandchildren. Thank you for taking the time to put “Get Rich with Dividends” in print.
    Lou Coe

  2. Please notify me of follow-up comments to you from my last earlier comments.

  3. You indicate that GPC has doubled over the past 10 years. That indicates a 7.2% annual price increase not the 9% used in the example. If you look at historical stock prices it gives even a lower rate of about 2.6% over the past 29 years. If you recalculated using growth rate closer to the historical rates, what would be the result after the next 10 years?

  4. What happens to this analysis when tax is involved? It would seem to me that up to half of the dividends would go for taxes unless taxes were paid out of other funds. In any event, the returns would not be nearly as large.

  5. Thank you for your attempt to respond. Again, your response is a very practical way that relates to long-term retirement goals. What about individuals that are near or at retirement that need a short-term solution. Are you indicating that there is none &/or that your newsletter does not cover short-term goals? Are you indicating that a short-term solution does not exist?

  6. I agree with Mr. Gueli: Retirement isn’t far away for me. I’m kind of late to the game. Can a combination of trading some stocks – watching them like a hawk every day – and gradually buying income stocks work, “feeding the habit” with part of my salary or pension?

Leave a Reply